Join our mailing list. Follow us at LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook, & Tiktok.
December 2024: Patterns of Activity. Light Pollution News.
Host:
Paul Bogard
Paul Bogard is the author of The End of Night: Searching for Natural Darkness in an Age of Artificial Light, a finalist for the PEN/E. O. Wilson Literary Science Writing Award. His most recent works include Solastalgia: An Anthology of Emotion in a Disappearing World and the children’s book What if Night? He is working on How to See the Sky: the Newest Science, the Oldest Questions, and Why They Matter for Life, to be published by HarperCollins in 2026. Paul is an associate professor of English at Hamline University in Saint Paul, Minnesota USA, where he teaches environmental literature and writing.
Travis Longcore
Dr. Travis Longcore is an Adjunct Professor and Co-Chair of the Environmental Science and Engineering Program at the UCLA Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, Science Director of The Urban Wildlands Group, and an independent ecological design and environmental policy consultant. He holds an Honors B.A. from the University of Delaware, and an M.A. and Ph.D. from UCLA, all in geography. He is co-editor of the 2006 book Ecological Consequences of Artificial Night Lighting and author of over 35 peer-reviewed articles and book chapters on light pollution. In 2022, he received the Galileo Award from the International Dark-Sky Association “in recognition of outstanding achievements in research or academic work on light pollution over a multiple-year period.”
Article List:
- Bird feeder cam captures hilarious pictures of animals enjoying midnight feast, Sara Odeen-Isbister, Metro.
- It’s Almost Halloween. That Means It’s Time for a Bat Beauty Contest, KQED Arts, KQED.
- Bureau of Land Management, Oct 28, 2024, Facebook.
- Does wildlife-vehicle collision frequency increase on full moon nights? A case-crossover analysis, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.
- The moon’s influence on the activity of tropical forest mammals, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.
- Urban house finches are more resistant to the effects of artificial light at night, Science of the Total Environment.
- Blue and white light pollution is disastrous for Cory’s shearwater fledglings, Journal of Experimental Biology.
- Artificial Light at Night Reduces the Surface Activity of Earthworms, Increases the Growth of a Cover Crop and Reduces Water Leaching, Land.
- Shedding light with harmonic radar: Unveiling the hidden impacts of streetlights on moth flight behavior, PNAS.
- Light pollution disturbs moths—even in the dark, study shows, Robert Emmerich, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Phys.org.
- Artificial light at night reveals hotspots and rapid development of industrial activity in the Arctic, PNAS.
- The power of satellite imagery in credit scoring: a spatial analysis of rural loans, Annals of Operations Research.
- Archaeologists Explore Life After Dark in the Ancient Night, Nancy Gonlin and April Nowell, Atlas Obscura.
- light pollution more light FRIGHT pollution (for best effect please read this sentence on all hallow’s eve), Qwantz.com.
- The Far Side, Facebook.
- Ouch, Right in the Childhood, Facebook.
Let’s kick things off with ecology today with this warmup.
A lady by the name of Danae Wolfe set up a bird feeder camera. Bird feeder cameras have been quite popular as of late. To date, she has captured a raccoon family, turkeys, a flying squirrel, and deer all at night.
And how about this! What if your level of light pollution could help determine your credit worthiness? Researchers in the journal, Annals of Operations Research posited that through the use of a night-time light intensity variable, a population distribution density variable, land use identification, and an efficiency measure for water use, they could feasibly improve credit score models assessing individuals living in rural Northern China. The authors of the paper believe that these variables “outperformed” other macroeconomic factors to build a more viable rating.
It wasn’t that long ago that we were all fine-tuning our Halloween costumes. So here’s a fun awareness campaign that the Bureau of Land Management Wyoming put on to bring attention to one of the spookiest mammals out there, bats.
Bats, which per BLM, consume upwards of “2,000 – 6,000 moths, beetles, flies and mosquitos” – have engaged in an annual beauty contest since 2019, think ‘Fat Bear Week.’
For you listening who do not reside in North America, Fat Bear Week is a week run by Katmai National Park and Preserve to bring awareness and attention to grizzly bears.
Well, in this case, BLM runs a social media campaign that encourages participants to vote for their favorite bat. Similar to Fat Bear Week, each contestant is assigned a humorous name – in this case, the competition eventually came down to two bats. Hoary Potter and the Guano of Fire, a hoary bat from Oregon, and Honey Bunches of MyOtis (a play on the cereal ‘Honey Bunches of Oats). Other names included ‘Sir Flaps-A-Lot,’ a Townsend’s big eared bat.
Unlike popular misconceptions spurred by cultural misgivings, “less than 1% of all bat populations carry rabies,” according to Emma Busk, a BLM wildlife technician.
We have a curious study from Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment which looked at the interesting case of wildlife vehicular collisions on full moon nights.
The study assessed both wildlife collisions and non-wildlife collisions in rural and urban areas within the state of Texas from January 2011 through to January 2020 – that’s 112 lunar cycles for you at home counting!
It found that there was a 46% uptick in wildlife-vehicle collisions during the full moon, as opposed to new moon nights in rural areas. The difference was less pronounced in urban areas. And there was no significant correlation between moon phases and non-wildlife vehicle collisions.
Interestingly, though, the author surmises that the cause of the increase in collisions derives from drivers becoming more complacent with greater levels of environmental illumination.
Staying on the topic of mother nature’s light pollution, the moon alters animal behavior. I don’t think this is a surprise for you at home listening. However, in a study in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B, researchers looked at 86 mammal species living in 17 protected forests across three continents using long-term camera data.
They found that 12 of them had a strong aversion to activities in moonlight. Three of them were strongly attracted to operating in moonlight.
30% avoided full moons, while 20% eagerly embraced activity during full moons.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, nocturnal species avoided full moons while crepuscular species like deer, were more active in full moons. Crepuscular means that the animal is most active during dawn and dusk. Researchers found that half of the species they captured in their cameras appeared to change their activity pending the moon phase.
Travis, you will be right at home with this one. A study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences utilized a harmonic radar to track the flight behavior of 95 moths up to 1 kilometer from a release point.
Get this, each moth was outfitted with a 12 millimeter long antenna! Only 4% of the moths actually flew toward streetlights. Many of the moths avoided streetlights and continually altered their path to do so, indicating that streetlights fragmented moth habitat.
We have a number of bird related articles this month.
First off, this probably isn’t much of a surprise given the species – urban house finches appear to be pretty resilient in the face of light pollution. In a study from the Science of the Total Environment, it was found that urban house finches might be doing just fine under artificial light. The study looked at birds from urban and rural areas in a controlled lighting environment.
Urban house finches didn’t appear to have increased stress hormones under artificial light at night exposure, but rural house finches did. Perhaps as a parallel to the increased stress, rural birds also showed a greater increase in levels of an intestinal parasite common to finches than the rate of growth for urban birds when affected by artificial light at night. Both bird sets suffered through sleep deprivation, with the urban birds suffering less than the rural ones.
From the Journal of Experimental Biology, researchers took a look at the shorebird, the Cory’s shearwater. Namely, researchers noted that Seabirds are under the most threat given human activity. One of those threats derives from light pollution.
Authors noted that when breeding ends, “thousands of burrow-nesting seabird fledglings fall to the ground in urban areas after encountering” light pollution. The fledglings look to be trapped in the light, so this study took a look to see if white/blue light was simply more dangerous than other forms of light for these birds.
Cory’s shearwater fledglings delayed decision making in environments with artificial light at night and appeared avoidant of blue light. Once exposed to such light, the birds became disoriented and trapped. It should be noted that this was a study of 131 individuals, whereby 20 self-selected for darkness and 6 self-selected for light.
Finally for ecology this month, an interesting study in the journal, Land. The study assessed artificial light at night’s impact on earthworms and the Phacelia plant species. As expected, earthworms steered clear of the florescent 4000K lighting by staying tucked away underground.
Germination of the Phacelia plants was low at 25%, apparently in line with studies that have solely tested the effects of earthworm behavior in the presence of artificial light at night. And, not surprisingly, the Phacelia plants, grew taller under artificial light at night.
The study did find that artificial light may be responsible for a significant reduction in water leaching given the amount of time earthworms tend to stay underground in the presence of light.
One of the interesting things about light pollution is our ability to track human activity based on the lights our industry emits at night. In an article published in PNAS, researchers studied the increase in artificial light at night from satellite images between 1992 through 2013.
The Russian Arctic experienced the greatest annual increase in lighting, modeled at 4.8%. Oil and gas extraction appears to be the primary culprit. Overall, it’s estimated that 5% of the Arctic showed impact from artificial light, however, that number is much more nuanced when we look at specific regions. Canadian activities affected .3% of the total Canadian Arctic, however, along the same analysis, Russia impacted 33% of their Arctic holdings. Finland, Norway, and Sweden, unsurprisingly, made up for roughly 90% of the total light impact on the European Arctic.
Here’s something interesting. A couple of researchers looked at how various cultures utilized their night. This might be my favorite article that we came across this month! From Atlas Obscura – originally in Sapiens, two authors, Nancy Gonlin and April Nowell, help illustrate what night was like across time and cultures.
For instance, nighttime in ancient Rome shared much in common with what we see today in our modern cities – loud noises, good food, drunken reverie, and of course, where there is alcohol, you have subsequent rowdy criminal behavior.
The Mayans saw the night as a time for many activities ranging from hunting to worship. In the Middle East, in Oman, ancient farmers watered their crops at night. And Polynesians navigated by the stars.
Side note on the Romans, they also partook in something that I thought came about quite a while later, but apparently not – Romans partook in the two sleeps phenomenon – whereby they rested for a few hours, then engaged in some sort of activity before resting again later in the night.
Let’s finish up this first half of the show with a little commentary on life. As a kid, I, maybe like you, enjoyed growing up reading the comics section of the newspaper. The internet sometimes rekindles things society takes for granted.
For instance, I love the Far Side comics. I’m not sure why I love them, the humor just does it for me. So I joined a Facebook Far Side group that shows random Far Side comics each day. I noticed a trend in the comics featuring a nighttime setting – each one seems to include stars and a moon, or sometimes just stars in the sky.
Then, randomly – or not randomly depending on how you feel about the tech industry, I saw an ad for another Facebook group – but this time it was for a Simpsons group with slides showing an apparent difference in how the Simpsons of the 80s and 90s portrayed night – essentially people were nostalgic at the romantic sky gradients and quaint nighttime appearance the show illustrators created.
Paul, I’m sure in your head you’re already well ahead of me here, but I do wonder what an illustrator would paint today given the same comic strips. Would there be any stars? Would there be a fading nighttime sky? The Simpsons even had frames showing a shimmering star lit reflection in the water at night.
Last month, a 21 year running comic strip named ‘Dinosaur Comics’ tackled the topic of light pollution. If you’re not familiar with Dinosaur Comics, it involves two t-rexes in the same six frames every release. There’s a green t-rex and an orange one, and essentially they jab witty commentary back and forth at each other while ravaging the human environment.
Back on October 16th, Ryan North, the accomplished author of the strip, took on the topic of light pollution! Whereby one dinosaur explains to the other that electric light has removed “basically the night sky’s #1 most visible feature!” From there, it descends into a bantering back and forth on modernity.
The best part of this comic may not actually be the comic strip itself, but rather the title – “Light Pollution, more like FRIGHT pollution,” obviously an homage to a spooky season tale, but I’m going to go a step further, and put my spin on it – maybe it’s also double entendre given that so much light pollution is in actuality driven from fright and fear.